Englishбългарски езикČeštinaItalianoLatviešuLietuvių kalbaromână
2013-04-28 GI2013-GI/GIS/GDI-Interoperability-Forum in DRESDEN

GI2013 - Interregional-GI/GIS/GDI-Interoperability - FORUM 29./30. April 2013 @ TU-Dresden, Bergstr. 120 - AgriCampus...

2013-04-13 [ Technische Universität Dresden streicht KARTOGRAPHIE ]

Technische Universität Dresden streicht Fachrichtung KARTOGRAPHIE... !!! ... Die über anderthalb Jahre laufenden...

2013-04-04 [ GI2013-Interoperability-FORUM ]

GI2013 - Forum - DRESDEN: 29./30. April 2013 An updated WEB Version of the pre-liminary Programme with interactive...

2013-03-29 GI2013 - Forum (Dresden: 29./30.04.2013 )

GI2013 - GI/GIS/GDI - Forum:  Dresden, 29./30.04.2013 The preliminary PROGRAMME (Web Version, PDF, ca. 1 MB) can be...

2013-03-21 Mrs. Dr. Gudrun HOFFMANN @BOWGIS retired !

[ IGN Vorstand ] Within last 20 years, e.g. since 1993, by former BOW (GIS-Academy), and later on as FAA (BOWGIS...

2013-01-01 2012 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog. Here’s an excerpt: 600 people...

2011-12-02 New speculation Welsh Government may abolish national park authorities

There was speculation last night that the Welsh Government may be intending to abolish national park authorities....

2011-12-02 FRACTURED FUTURE – Scientific fact vs. public fears on water issues

The public in New Brunswick should not fear that their water supplies and their air quality will be compromised because...

2011-12-02 The Politics of Marine Conservation

During the past 10-plus years, the California planning process to designate marine protected areas (MPAs) has included...

2011-12-02 Did Canada cover up deadly salmon virus? Report suggests yes

Call it Salmongate. The deepening controversy over who knew what and when about a deadly virus that may or may not have...

2012-01-16 Proceedings LeGIO-Workshop: GIS-education in a changing academic environment

The proceedings of the

2011-06-20 INSPIRE Essentials workshop at INSPIRE Conference

Monday June 27th - 14:00 - 

2011-06-20 INSPIRE Essentials workshop at INSPIRE Conference


2010-11-15 EnviSDI - Spatial Data Infrastructure for environmental datasets

EnviSDI – Summer School on “Spatial Data Infrastructure for environmental datasets” ,...

2010-09-18 Geoportal & Social Network Sites

“A social network consists of a finite set or sets of actors and the relation or relations defined on them....

8th European GIS Education Seminar

When : 6 Sep 2012 - 9 Sep 2012
Venue : Leuven, Belgium
URL :...

2013-04-12 INSPIRE in der Hosentasche / INSPIRE in the Pocket !

INSPIRE in der Hosentasche / INSPIRE in the POCKET

Another SISE group...

2012-02-22 Articles Features HABITATS – Towards the Interoperability through Social Validation HABITATS – Towards the Interoperability through Social Validation

The HABITATS project (Social Validation of INSPIRE Annex III Data Structures in EU HABITATS) focuses on adoption of...

2011-10-09 Habitats Reference Laboratory is moving to Liferay

To make Habitats Reference Laboratory compatible with recommended Habitats networking architecture, we move...

2011-04-18 Habitats Social Network

The HABITATS project focuses on the adoption of INSPIRE standards through a participatory process to design and...

2011-01-02 Geoportal4everybody became flag ship for Czech Contribution to UNSDI

Due the fact, that we would like to contribute to building SDI globally we decide to connect two our initiatives...

2011-01-02 Social Space for Geospatial Information

This paper introduce ideas to build social space for sharing spatial data, information, but also experience with...

Web 2.0

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International (O’Reilly, 2005). There are many definitions of what Web 2.0 is. For the purpose of this report we have selected the following one:

“Web 2.0 is the network as platform, spanning all connected devices; Web 2.0 applications are those that make the most of the intrinsic advantages of that platform: delivering software as a continually-updated service that gets better the more people use it, consuming and remixing data from multiple sources, including individual users, while providing their own data and services in a form that allows remixing by others, creating network effects through an "architecture of participation," and going beyond the page metaphor of Web 1.0 to deliver rich user experiences.” (cit. Tim O’Reilly: Web 2.0: Compact definition?, http://radar.oreilly.com/2005/10/web-20-compact-definition.html)

Web 2.0 can be described according to the report by Osimo [2008] and research of O’Reilly and Forrester. Web 2.0 is composed of a set of:

  • Technologies - building blocks of web 2.0, e.g Ajax, XML, Open API, Microformats, Flash/Flex and other techniques for creation of web applications.
  • Applications -allow easy publishing, information sharing and collaboration. They include blogs, wikis, podcasts, RSS feeds, tagging, social network sites (e.g. Facebook, Myspace), search engines, Massive Multiplayer Online and others.
  • Values - they build on the knowledge and skills of the user – 1. user as a content producer/provider, 2. user providing feedback, comments, reviews of the existing content, 3. users who access, read and watch the existing content, 4. user who does not benefit from web 2.0 applications and values.

Web 2.0 Design Patterns

Web 2.0 websites are focused on involvement of their users as content providers with rights to control the data. As a summary of key features of Web 2.0 O’Reilly (2005) introduced eight key patterns of Web 2.0.

"Each pattern describes a problem that occurs over and over again in our environment, and then describes the core of the solution to that problem, in such a way that you can use this solution a million times over, without ever doing it the same way twice." [O’Reilly (2005)]

  1. The Long Tail- Small sites make up the bulk of the internet's content; narrow niches make up the bulk of internet's the possible applications. Therefore: Leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head.
  2. Data is the Next Intel Inside- Applications are increasingly data-driven. Therefore: For competitive advantage, seek to own a unique, hard-to-recreate source of data.
  3. Users Add Value- The key to competitive advantage in internet applications is the extent to which users add their own data to that which you provide. Therefore: Don't restrict your "architecture of participation" to software development. Involve your users both implicitly and explicitly in adding value to your application.
  4. Network Effects by Default - Only a small percentage of users will go to the trouble of adding value to your application. Therefore: Set inclusive defaults for aggregating user data as a side-effect of their use of the application.
  5. Some Rights Reserved- Intellectual property protection limits re-use and prevents experimentation. Therefore: When benefits come from collective adoption, not private restriction, make sure that barriers to adoption are low. Follow existing standards, and use licenses with as few restrictions as possible. Design for "hackability" and "remixability."
  6. The Perpetual Beta- When devices and programs are connected to the internet, applications are no longer software artifacts, they are ongoing services. Therefore: Don't package up new features into monolithic releases, but instead add them on a regular basis as part of the normal user experience. Engage your users as real-time testers, and instrument the service so that you know how people use the new features.
  7. Cooperate, Don't Control- Web 2.0 applications are built of a network of cooperating data services. Therefore: Offer web services interfaces and content syndication, and re-use the data services of others. Support lightweight programming models that allow for loosely-coupled systems.
  8. Software Above the Level of a Single Device- The PC is no longer the only access device for internet applications, and applications that are limited to a single device are less valuable than those that are connected. Therefore: Design your application from the get-go to integrate services across handheld devices, PCs, and internet servers.

References

[Alexander, 1977] Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York, Oxford University Press, 1977.

[O’Reilly, 2005] O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. 30.09.2005, [Online]: http://oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html

[Osimo, 2008] Osimo, D.: Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? JRC Scientific and Technical Report, European Communities, 2008, ISSN 1018-5593

RSS feed